IANAL, but you have some valid points.
GS should certainly include a copy of the licence and refer to it more frequently in the source files. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html
There should probably be an exception statement to allow plugin and theme authors to use other licences, for example, this statement is part of WolfCMS.
Plugin authors should specify the licence, too. Also be careful about what they bundle with their plugins, for example, JavaScript libraries that may require specific acknowledgement or even prevent redistribution.
GS should certainly include a copy of the licence and refer to it more frequently in the source files. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html
There should probably be an exception statement to allow plugin and theme authors to use other licences, for example, this statement is part of WolfCMS.
Plugin authors should specify the licence, too. Also be careful about what they bundle with their plugins, for example, JavaScript libraries that may require specific acknowledgement or even prevent redistribution.
mvlcek Wrote:... must also be licensed under the GPLv3 (or be more permissive).Had to smile there. Is more permissive possible ?
--
Nick.
Nick.