2010-06-11, 03:05:25
(This post was last modified: 2010-06-11, 03:08:42 by douglasboyer.)
I've been checking out both getsimple and gpeasy for a little while.
My personal thoughts:
gpEasy has many features that make it easier or more intuitive to use. On the fly editing is great, layout configuration, file management and browse for files is better than getsimple. It has a very nice and easy to use gallery implementation of colorbox. I think it uses CKEditor in a better way--it doesn't reduce the features like getsimple does.
So, there are many things that gpEasy does very well; however, there are a few things that need improvement. Getsimple does a better job with page options, htaccess automatically setup and pretty urls are very flexible.
Some will like getsimple's admin over gpEasy and vise verse.
Both have some great features, both are very "simple" to use and great light weight CMS.
I personally think they would meld into one great project. They are the top 2, IMHO, light-weight easy to use CMS that do not require a database.
My personal thoughts:
gpEasy has many features that make it easier or more intuitive to use. On the fly editing is great, layout configuration, file management and browse for files is better than getsimple. It has a very nice and easy to use gallery implementation of colorbox. I think it uses CKEditor in a better way--it doesn't reduce the features like getsimple does.
So, there are many things that gpEasy does very well; however, there are a few things that need improvement. Getsimple does a better job with page options, htaccess automatically setup and pretty urls are very flexible.
Some will like getsimple's admin over gpEasy and vise verse.
Both have some great features, both are very "simple" to use and great light weight CMS.
I personally think they would meld into one great project. They are the top 2, IMHO, light-weight easy to use CMS that do not require a database.