Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
More on Components...
#17
ccagle8 Wrote:
pixelita Wrote:But ... are WE who GS is for? It seems to me, or at least this is how I plan my marketing spin, that GS was designed to drive a simple web site, managed by the end user (the site's owner).


I couldn't agree more with that statement Pixelita


Which is exactly why I suggested the HTML editor being turned on for even the components sections. Any "end user" who isn't at all tech savvy and isn't willing to become tech savvy, is going to be annoyed with trying to make something look a certain way and not being able to see it in a WYSIWYG interface before it's published.

I do fully agree that there should be an ability to put php code directly into the components sections if needed, but surely there's a way to have both options?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
More on Components... - by badcat - 2009-08-08, 08:05:47
More on Components... - by Derek - 2009-08-08, 08:24:56
More on Components... - by badcat - 2009-08-08, 08:29:20
More on Components... - by kristjanmik - 2009-08-08, 11:08:19
More on Components... - by ccagle8 - 2009-08-08, 11:54:24
More on Components... - by someone - 2009-08-08, 16:49:36
More on Components... - by ccagle8 - 2009-08-08, 23:40:10
More on Components... - by g.net - 2009-08-16, 04:40:07
More on Components... - by g.net - 2009-08-23, 22:57:32
More on Components... - by ccagle8 - 2009-08-24, 00:03:27
More on Components... - by someone - 2009-08-24, 06:56:32
More on Components... - by ccagle8 - 2009-08-24, 08:53:00
More on Components... - by g.net - 2009-08-25, 02:56:10
More on Components... - by pixelita - 2009-08-25, 12:53:23
More on Components... - by someone - 2009-08-25, 21:26:31
More on Components... - by ccagle8 - 2009-08-26, 12:51:40
More on Components... - by g.net - 2009-08-29, 01:15:58



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)