@polyfragmented: this "go back" link is a problematic thing. I added it because several people requested it, but there's no clean and concise way to implement it.
Ideally, you only want to see this link beneath a post when you came from a sub-, archive-, tag- or search page, no? But what then if you were viewing such a page, but actually used a sidebar link to get to the post you're viewing right now (meaning you not necessarily want to go back)?
So that's why I chose for the simple solution of javascript:history.back(), as it suits most people's needs. Your suggestion makes sense too, but I think the majority prefers to just go back (to their search results/archive- or tag-page) instead of being taken to the main news page.
To be honest, I don't really see the need for such a back link anyway because that's where your browser's go back button is for, isn't it? Ah well, maybe I'll think of some smart way to implement this feature the way I think it should work. And if anyone has a good suggestion, let me hear it!
@rene: I'm glad it worked out fine. About this content being replaced, I might add an option later such that you can choose to either replace the content or append to it. We'll see.
Ideally, you only want to see this link beneath a post when you came from a sub-, archive-, tag- or search page, no? But what then if you were viewing such a page, but actually used a sidebar link to get to the post you're viewing right now (meaning you not necessarily want to go back)?
So that's why I chose for the simple solution of javascript:history.back(), as it suits most people's needs. Your suggestion makes sense too, but I think the majority prefers to just go back (to their search results/archive- or tag-page) instead of being taken to the main news page.
To be honest, I don't really see the need for such a back link anyway because that's where your browser's go back button is for, isn't it? Ah well, maybe I'll think of some smart way to implement this feature the way I think it should work. And if anyone has a good suggestion, let me hear it!
@rene: I'm glad it worked out fine. About this content being replaced, I might add an option later such that you can choose to either replace the content or append to it. We'll see.