2010-10-30, 01:23:16
Interesting, though I would never use it. (And wouldn’t advice others to use it either.)
From a SEO point of view, very little has been changed from the default theme.
However, other points have been hurt. The way you added style to the elements does not validate as XHTML and never has. If you’re planning to use “old style HTML†change your theme to HTML.
It’s flexible, that sounds like an accessibility pro. But in reality you’re hurting accessibility. Mediawiki has a point against tables for presentation. Somewhat more opinionated (but valid) points about this use of tables has also been featured by WordPress Freelancer.
From a SEO point of view, very little has been changed from the default theme.
However, other points have been hurt. The way you added style to the elements does not validate as XHTML and never has. If you’re planning to use “old style HTML†change your theme to HTML.
It’s flexible, that sounds like an accessibility pro. But in reality you’re hurting accessibility. Mediawiki has a point against tables for presentation. Somewhat more opinionated (but valid) points about this use of tables has also been featured by WordPress Freelancer.
“Don’t forget the important ˚ (not °) on the a,†says the Unicode lover.
Help us test a key change for the core! ¶ Problems with GetSimple? Be sure to enable debug mode!
Help us test a key change for the core! ¶ Problems with GetSimple? Be sure to enable debug mode!