Download
2013-03-04, 06:42:44
(This post was last modified: 2013-03-04, 06:56:01 by WebDevandPhoto.)
Something doesn't sound right about that... my plugin is indicative of my theme and 98% of the code can function without GetSimple.
If GS can't have an amended license (dual license options may be possible) to where buyers aren't allowed to distribute our themes then there's ABSOLUTELY no point to making commercially available themes.
No I think something is really wrong about this.
No website software will last if developers/theme designers can not have the right to sell their work and retain both attribution for their work and require it to be purchased.
That was not my interpretation of GPLv3, hence why I was pre-maturely excited about it when I first showed up on this forum.
Edit:
We'll see what StackOverflow members suggest:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15190...-designers
If it matches up to what mvleck was saying then we have a serious problem and I'll be leaving GS if it can't be amended.
If GS can't have an amended license (dual license options may be possible) to where buyers aren't allowed to distribute our themes then there's ABSOLUTELY no point to making commercially available themes.
No I think something is really wrong about this.
No website software will last if developers/theme designers can not have the right to sell their work and retain both attribution for their work and require it to be purchased.
That was not my interpretation of GPLv3, hence why I was pre-maturely excited about it when I first showed up on this forum.
Edit:
We'll see what StackOverflow members suggest:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15190...-designers
If it matches up to what mvleck was saying then we have a serious problem and I'll be leaving GS if it can't be amended.
